Talk:Jean-Claude Mézières/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:26, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   • Ref #3 [1], ref #25 [2], ref #9 [3] (Google cache) and one EL [4] are dead.  Done

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   • {http://ludogrid.free.fr/} is not an RS;  Done

   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects):

   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   • Some referencing issues to be fixed as per above. On hold. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)  Done

   I think that's all fixed now. - Joe King (talk)

   OK, keep GA status, thanks for your hard work. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)