Talk:Jay Bouwmeester/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   One of the better written articles I've seen on a contemporary athlete.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Everything is cited, and all cites are properly formatted with Template:Cite web

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Summarizes concisely, doesn't dwell too much on anything.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Reviewer: ~DC _{Let's Vent} 03:06, 11 September 2010 (UTC)