Talk:Java War (1741–1743)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 17:48, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:48, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

• Wow that was quick. Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:58, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Was moved to Java War (1741–1743). Seems to be an en-dash thing, so considering the arbcom case and sanctions I'm not going to get involved. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:42, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   How can you regain greater control? They can gain or assert, but not regain. Nove: on 7 October 1740 after revolted. Two "following day" in quick succession, reword.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   How is imposing a curfew related to crushing the revolt? Isn't that something separate?

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• I've fixed the grammar and logic issues you have already mentioned. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)