Talk:Java Portlet Specification

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Needed introduction

This page *really* needs an introduction to explain the context and what the things are. contract is very vague and one of the two terms in the description is redlinked! 83.217.109.164 (talk) 16:17, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History of the different JSRs is needed too. Syced (talk) 06:15, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that JSR 168 Portlet Catalog be merged into Java Portlet Specification. There is not enough content right now for two separate articles. Even if there was, catalogs of portlets are not something that are notable enough to require more than a section. Syced (talk) 06:15, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and

Done Klbrain (talk) 16:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Java Portlet Specification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100613131851/http://www.java.net/ to http://java.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Portlet

The concept of portlet is distinct from one specific implementation of a portlet. Having portlet redirect here does no favors to either article. The JPS article is confusing because it tries to discuss the specification before the concept of portlets and has no where to refer readers to get information about them. I've tried to address this with a background section, but that mostly lampshades how clunky it is to conflate the two topics. Just like applet is distinct from Java Applet, portlet should be distinct from the concept of Java's implementation. If they are discussed on the same page, the page title should be portlet and the Java Specification should be a subtopic. Ost (talk) 21:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]