Talk:Jasperware

Dating Jasper Ware section

Obviously this section needs a rewrite in encyclopedic not chatty style.

Alright, you go to the ball, I'll stay home and scrub the fireplace. I removed this text and rewrote it as best as possible -- note the factual inclarities on overlapping dates in the original, which I have tried to rationalize as best as possible:

Beware of exceptions to rules.

If a piece is modern/vintage, ie: 1908-present date. Usually the marks to the reverse of any Jasper Ware piece will be Wedgwood, Made in England.

If these marks are separated, then the piece is more likely to be prior to 1970. If the stamp is all together, then it is a later piece. The exceptions to the rule for this, are smaller objects, like thimbles, and other miniatures. These most often carry Wedgwood England, purely because of the size of the item in comparison to the stamp.

Pre-1908. Items pre 1908 are marked Wedgwood England. I don't have a sample to hand for you, but it is separated, and not a uniform stamp like the one displayed above. The letters accompanying the Wedgwood England for items dating between 1891-1908 are a dating code, which I will enter into shortly.

Pre 1891 There was a three letter dating code in place. This ran from circa 1860-91. Those three letters would represent the month, the potter, and the year in that order. You can start at O for 1860, P for 1861, etc. This wasn't foolproof for dating purposes as it did overlap, and for certain letters, there are two possible dates.

Pre 1860 Is Wedgwood only. Usually accompanied by other potter markings and a single letter.

Layout problem

In Firefox 2 I'm getting a layout problem with the "Please Expand this Article" box going under the righthand photos, and the "Edit" link for the Dating Jasperware section appearing too far down.

Can anyone fix this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.7.19.87 (talk) 00:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

File:Jasperware.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Jasperware.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Jasperware.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaning Wedgwood Jasperware

Can someone tell me how to clean it? 24.16.77.39 (talk) 18:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jasperware. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100606185818/http://www.buttoncountry.com/index.htm to http://www.buttoncountry.com/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]