Jump to content

Talk:Jason Bedrick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jason Bedrick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:05, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I do not really understand all the continuous reversions, This is exactly according to the text: He has clearly mentioned that Huck "expanded health care for children, eliminated vending machines in public schools to curb childhood obesity and created incentives for small businesses to offer health insurance" as his "achievements" and called these as his successes. What is the rationale for reversions?--Drako (talk) 20:02, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The rationale is this: the article in question was why Jews should support Huckabee (as he notes in the first sentence), not why Bedrick did. He even noted in the piece that there were several areas where he disagreed with Huckabee but where Huckabee was closer to mainstream American Jewish opinion than Bedrick was. You can't extrapolate from those examples that Bedrick supported Huckabee's views on those issues, especially when he specifically states in the article that he didn't agree with Huckabee on everything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Granitestater7 (talkcontribs) 16:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]