Talk:Japji Sahib

India: Punjab Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Punjab portal This article is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India) (assessed as High-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Sikhism

This article is part of WikiProject Sikhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Sikhism. Please participate by editing the article, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.

Guidelines: Manual of Style - Naming conventionsSikhismWikipedia:WikiProject SikhismTemplate:WikiProject SikhismSikhism articles

Untitled

mrry vehguru ji kirpa karyoo sab te —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.83.89 (talk) 15:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biased

This information seems to be for Sikhs only, and shows unnecessary bias towards Sikhs. There's plenty of links in the 'external links', and as such, no need for this gloss and exegesis. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ#Religion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.225.246.61 (talk) 15:26, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

problem here

In one of the translations, I believe it was for Ek Onkar, their is a description of what that means. And after that in parenthesis it says how Guru Nanak Dev Ji rejects the Hindu belief. But why is that part their? FIrst of all weather he rejected it or nto, the point is JUST to translate what Ek Onkar means. Why do you have to point out the part of the Hindu bliefe?....Secondly....Hindus dont have a fixed believe in one god or more then one god. It is interpreation only. Not all Hindus bleive in more then one god, and not all Hindus believe in one god then.......Thirdly I dont think people should speak for Guru Nanak Dev ji and his belief's. Im not saying he was Hindu. But im also not saying he didnt believe in some aspects of Hinduism then. So since this is up for debate, how about just being fair and translating what Ek Onkar means. And dont add the part after that because its not necessariy then. 71.105.87.54 (talk) 17:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the babbling and incoherent sentence of "rejects Hindu beliefs of gods coming in reincarnation... " because of its irrelevance, incorrectness and its arrogant attempt to extrapolate what Guru Nanak Dev ji did NOT say. 115.113.11.239 (talk) 12:42, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original in Gurmukhi script

Please post the original version in Gurmukhi too. Thanks.--History Sleuth (talk) 23:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Japji Sahib/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Contains an abridged Japji. Should be more removed so as not to be a WikiSource article. To improve, should be condensed and structured to provide summary and/or analysis. Any disagreements?--Elliotb2 (talk) 09:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 09:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 19:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Not a Fact

"Japji Sahib is believed to be the first composition of Guru Nanak"

Fact

'Japji Sahib' is the LAST composition of Guru Nanak. It is the quintessence of all his life's work dictated by him to his best student Angad Sahib as part of their one-to-one Handing / Taking over of the baton of Guruship.

http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Scripting_the_True_Path

--Writer Col Rajender Singh Nirvair Khalsa (talk) 11:21, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with External links

I have just removed the following, thus emptying the External links section

I really couldn't care less which link we supply but we do not need links to umpteen versions of similar material and this looks like spammed stuff. Please read WP:EL and gain consensus here for the inclusion of just one appropriate link.

Please note that links to Amazon and scribd.com are definitely not acceptable- Sitush (talk) 09:11, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]