Talk:Japanese ironclad Ryūjō/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 06:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is good shape. A few comments:

should this be at Japanese corvette Ryūjō? Or at least have a redirect from that title? If a move isn't appropriate, perhaps change armoured to ironclad in the first sentence and infobox to reflect the title?
ironclad or armoured corvette should appear somewhere early in the body
in Note 1, quote→quoted
you could link propeller
you could lk=on to link kW
the sentence beginning "All of which" doesn't have a subject
is there a calibre available for the 70-pounder guns?
- Not that I can find, All of the London Ordnance Works' guns are not well documented.
suggest "for the price of 270,000 gold Ryō on 12 April. The domain renamed it Ryōshō"
what are/were Ryōshō and Ryūjō? Could you provide a translation or meaning?
- The latter's meaning is in the lede. Lemme look for the former.
  - No joy on a translation for Ryosho. Google translate on the ship's article on Japenese wiki wasn't helpful either.
link sloop-of-war
and she was transferred to the Tōkai Naval Station
say Tōkai Naval Station was at Yokohama, I believe that is correct at that time
12 September 18794 to 17 February 1895
the ref anchors aren't working because the sfn's don't have the year of publication
- If I needed to disambiguate the notes, I'd have added them! Just another reason to despise sfn/harv formats.
author-link Thomas Brassey, 1st Earl Brassey
File:Japanese Ironclad warship Ryujo.jpg needs info about its publication, it is unclear
same goes for File:RyujoAndHorse.jpg
- Added note stating no known US publication to both images. The Japanese license is either or, not both.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:32, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I have, placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:03, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Almost all of these are done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:32, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All done. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:46, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, a pleasure. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by acceptably licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]