Talk:Japanese encephalitis vaccine

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Translation Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Translation task force (assessed as High-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Japanese encephalitis vaccine.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Date of Vaccine

The article says that a vaccine was created in the 1930s. However, it appears that the virus was first isolated in 1934 (see Vaccines: A Biography, p317) and the vaccine was not licensed until 1954 (according to WHO). If I had more confidence and Wikipedia knowledge, I'd update the page myself, but right now I'm being cautious.

Peterhurford (talk) 05:34, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extra Doses

"Extra doses are not typically needed in areas where the disease is common." Is this because in areas where the disease is common more people contract it and a general immunity is built up? It seems counter-intuitive that disease prevalence decreases the need to protect against said disease. Citation or more info needed perhaps.--Lucas559 (talk) 19:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes because you get natural boosters I imagine. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:21, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Japanese encephalitis vaccine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121117205611/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Hyderabad/India-s-first-Japanese-encephalitis-vaccine-launched/Article1-929430.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Hyderabad/India-s-first-Japanese-encephalitis-vaccine-launched/Article1-929430.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]