Talk:Japanese dragon

Japan: Culture / Mythology / Shinto High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 07:49, November 20, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Culture task force.

This article is supported by the Mythology task force.

This article is supported by the Shinto task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Mythology High‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Folklore High‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Originated from China

In Japanese wiki, it's clearly states that such dragon was originated from Chinese dragon. (Buhuzu (talk) 05:44, 30 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]

dragon kings?

This has recently been added to the article:

There are Dragon Kings in Japanese folklore. The main ones recognized in Japan are:

1. Sui Riu - a rain-dragon, which when in pain causes red rain, colored by its blood.

2. Han Riu - a striped dragon with nine different colors, forty feet long. Can never reach heaven.

3. Ka Riu - a small dragon; only seven feet long. Ka-Riu is a fiery red. Some sources even say that its body is all flame.

4. Ri Riu - has wonderful sight and can see more than 100 miles.

I don't know how legit all this is, so I'll let it stay in the article, but I wouldn't mind some clarification of sources on this one. (Oh, and I'm changing the riu into ryū.) TomorrowTime 11:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So... I did a little burrowing, and the original for the so-called "dragon kings of Japan" seems to be this book [1], called DRAGONS AND DRAGON LORE BY ERNEST INGERSOLL, written in 1928, more precisely, the ninth chapter [2]. Ingersoll is in turn quoting someone called Joly (he fails to provide a first name), who wrote "circa 50 years ago". So the original source would seem to be from the middle 19th century. I have my doubts about the veracity of this source. I have tried searching the internet for 水龍/水竜, 火竜/火龍 and 里竜/里龍 (I'm not sure what the han is supposed to be). The majority of the water dragons are hits for a certain brand of sake, the majority of the fire dragons are anime related, and the Ri dragon is only ever mentioned as the name of a peak in Taiwan. I think it's pretty safe to say that the four dragon kings are probably not legit folklore. If nobody speaks up in a week or so, I'll remove the whole section. TomorrowTime 20:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the user who put in the unsourced information was (as usual) Dragonsinn, who also insists on only identifying his external link as the "correct" one. I'd rather not see self-promotion with websites in an encyclopedia article. Especially with websites that are uncited in the articles. 24.14.198.8 17:18, 25 June 2007 (UTC) Chris G.[reply]

Well, citations can be found for this info, the problem is that the source is not all that reliable, IMO. I asked around and someone more knowledgable than me had this to say:

I have only ever read of these dragon kings in Ingersoll's book and others who have subsiquently quoted him.

Ingersoll wrote in a very arrogant way (as many westerners did) assuming all legends were nothing more than total native superstition. He reguarded the dragon as totaly imaginary and even rejected the sugestion that fossil bones might have influenced the legend. Pradoxicaly he made many assumptions about the religoius belifes of pre-historic man with no evidence save his own imagination.

Ingersoll's work is now largly disreguarded. [...]

To check on these dragon kings we need to unearth some old Japanese references to them.

So, it is a completely viable assumption that these dragon kings have some possible origins in actual Japanese folklore, but until references from authors other than Ingersoll can be found, I'd say it's better to remove them from the main page. TomorrowTime 10:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rectification

Although your article is very instructive concerning the peculiarities of the Japanese version of the Dragon, the East Asian Dragon, as it is well-known, is originally Chinese. Saying that it is originally Buddhist is clearly a falsification. I don't know if it is intentional, I presume not, so I have rectified the article. The same for "the four divine beasts of Japanese mythology", you can check this in the good article about "Four Symbols (Chinese constellation)". Just for your information, "ryu" comes from the Sui-Tang dynasties' capital pronounciation (Chang'An) "lyowng", and the four Symbols, Suzaku, Genbu, Byakko, Seiryu all come respectively from "Tsyu Tsyak", "Hwen Bu" ("Bu" in late middle Chinese, "miu" in early middle Chinese), "Baek Xou", "Tsheng Lyowng". For the modern Chinese mandarin dialect, Korean and Vietnamese pronounciations, see the article "Four Symbols".

This can be seen as little details, but in a media like Wikipedia, it is important to inform without bias.

周麗慧 Tsiuw Leihwei

Islands as dragon

Has anyone heard of the myth about the islands of Japan being a dragon? I don't remember when or where I've heard it, but the legend explains the differences in the numbers of claws between Chinese and Japanese dragons. The myth says that:

A Chinese dragon encountered great peril in its country, and it had to leave. In its haste, the dragon travelled eastward toward the rising sun. But on its way, it met obstacles of great difficulty and had to use its ultimate powers by sacrifice - the dragon lost a claw from each foot. After escaping out to sea, the tired dragon went to sleep, thus forming the islands of Japan.

I think there is a similar myth for Hong Kong and it may be related. There might be a "bigger" story where there were several dragons fighting over the mainland and one won over the others - remaining to be the guardian of the Imperial family... or something like that. Has anyone encountered a story like that? --Emana 00:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard that myth before (although I can't remember where, exactly), so yes, I believe that, with some more citations, something ought to be added to the article about it. 24.124.88.11 (talk) 16:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

in modern culture

do we need this section? is it really necessary to list every single story that happens to have a dragon in it? 97.122.119.97 (talk) 01:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Japanese dragon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081026155019/http://fax.libs.uga.edu/GR830xD7xV8/ to http://fax.libs.uga.edu/GR830xD7xV8/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Japanese dragon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121208200416/http://www2.gol.com/users/stever/spring.htm to http://www2.gol.com/users/stever/spring.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:33, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Japanese dragon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080620211020/http://www.dragonorama.com/oriental/japanese.html to http://www.dragonorama.com/oriental/japanese.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing sentence needs clarification

Under the heading "Chinese-Japanese dragons", the 4th sentence in the penultimate paragraph states "However, contrary to the Japanese belief that the three-clawed dragons also originated from China and was introduced in Japan." This doesn't make any sense. I think that what the editor was trying to say is that "contrary to the Japanese belief, three-clawed dragons originated in China and were introduced to Japan", but frankly I am not certain. Can anyone clarify? Thanks. Bricology (talk) 12:40, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]