Talk:Japanese destroyer Take (1944)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 09:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 01:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Initial review
[edit]After a quick read, the article looks good. A more thorough review will follow shortly. Djmaschek (talk) 01:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Review 1
[edit]GA class = Passed. After writing up the review, I decided to make the changes listed in the last 3 bullet points because they were so minor. Djmaschek (talk) 02:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well-written.
Done But please see my notes below. - Verifiable. Done
- Broad coverage. Done
- Neutral. Done
- Stable. Done
- Illustrated. Done
- Specs in text match those in infobox. Done
- Construction and career, paragraph 3: This is written correctly. However, when I read it, I was confused by the fact that TA-4 went first followed by TA-3. So, I had to reread it carefully. My suggestion is to change "the troop ships" to "the TA-4 troop ships". This should clear up any confusion in readers like me.
- Construction and career, paragraph 4, sentences 6, 7 & 8: The tense suddenly changes from past to present tense. There are 3 words "is" that need to be changed to "was" and one "are" that needs to be changed to "were". (convoy is; are sunk; is badly; Take is not.)
- Construction and career, paragraph 5: USS Cooper needs a hyperlink.
