Jump to content

Talk:Japanese cruiser Yakumo/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 22:46, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

[edit]
  • Well-written:
  • Although a few very minor grammatical and spelling corrections were required, the article now satisfies the MOS policies on style and structure, layout and grammar. "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 05:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
  • Verifiable with no original research:
  • No signs of original research anywhere in the article, which cites a large quantity of reliable publications in its list of sources. "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
    (c) it contains no original research
  • Broad in its coverage:
  • The article's coverage of encyclopedically relevant aspects to its topic is very broad and thorough, managing to exclude trivial or excessive details. "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 05:15, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
  • Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  • The article's tone is entirely neutral and fair to all perspectives on the topic. "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  • The article has not undergone any disruptive editing for at least a year's time, based on a quick review of the revision history. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 01:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  • All images used in the article are public domain; all provide relevant illustration. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 01:12, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

    Passed. "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]