Jump to content

Talk:Japanese cruiser Izumo/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 17:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    See defence and defense.
    Link Knyaz Suvorov
    ...closer to the Russian border - closer than what?
    Dunno. The first landing was somewhere NE of Wonsan, but I can't find the name anywhere so it's probably some dinky fishing village or something, rendered in British English through Japanese from the original Korean.
    Might be worth a post at WP:KOREA - I've had some good luck finding place names in China and New Guinea from their old German names.
    Baja California shouldn't be italicized
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    File:Japanese cruiser Izumo in Kobe.jpg - needs a source
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Couldn't find the photo on Google image, so I deleted it as there's no clear evidence of publishing before '56. I've dealt with everything else, I think, so see if they suit. I hope that this is starting a trend for you to review more! Many thanks for knocking off my three.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly I think it's a trend of being more active in general lately - you might have noticed I've started chopping through the American BBs over the past week or so. Shame about the photo, since you don't generally get one showing the shipbreaking process. Parsecboy (talk) 19:06, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]