Talk:Japanese cruiser Azuma/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 22:46, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

Well-written:

After making a handful of grammatical corrections or adjustments, I feel the article now complies with MOS policies on grammar, layout and structure. "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 04:55, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article has a healthy quantity of reliable sources listed in its bibliography; it makes frequent use of them and shows no traces of original research. "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 04:50, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article covers all encyclopedically relevant aspects of its topic, in a balanced fashion. "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 04:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article's tone is free of bias. "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 04:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

The article has not suffered disruptive editing for at least a year and a few months. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 01:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

All images used are public domain, and also relevant to the article's topic. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 01:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

I feel the article satisfies the GA criteria, as per the results of this review. Congratulations! "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 04:56, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]