Talk:Japanese cruiser Agano
Appearance
Japanese cruiser Agano has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 30, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Japanese cruiser Agano article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
organization
[edit]Cruisers are listed directly in Category:Cruisers of Japan and indirectly through its by-class subcategories. Also certain of these same cruisers are directly in Category:Cruisers of the Imperial Japanese Navy and indirectly through its by-class subcategories. Is there some purpose in this duplicative structure? Hmains (talk) 18:20, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese cruiser Agano/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 08:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
As expected, this article is in good shape. A few comments:
- link=on the power in the body to link kW?
- I think there is a space missing in "41st Year Type15-centimeter (6 in) guns"? Perhaps "41st Year Type 15-centimeter (6 in) guns"?
- perhaps just clarify that the TTs were on deck not in the hull if that is right?
- I think the lang|ja set-up creates an odd effect. Perhaps just italicise it?
- Me too, but I'm trying to cater to the visually impaired who need screen readers which can decode the language template rather than just say "italicized".
- perhaps mention in the body that the Guadalcanal operation was Operation Ke?
- is there a link for the Mobile Fleet?
- perhaps I'm being a bit dim here, but suggest "In response to the American carrier raid"
- suggest "The leading destroyer division of four
destroyers" - "Agano and her sister" needs italics
- suggest "Four days later, the American aircraft carriers"
- boiler rooms is a dab
- "the American submarine Albacore"
- "from her escort"→"from Urakaze
- "and her sister took" which one was that?
- "by the American submarine Skate
- a location for Stille would be nice, but not required at GAN
Otherwise all good. Placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:28, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
- All done. Thanks for your thorough review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:57, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
- No worries. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:07, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class Japanese military history articles
- Japanese military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages