Talk:Japanese battleship Settsu/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 13:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Probably best to link Battle of Tsingtao, Washington Naval Treaty again in the body.

   What type of ship was Tosa?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Gotta love Japanese copyright law for these ships.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Just a couple quibbles here and there, great work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 13:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

All done, thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:57, 29 October 2013 (UTC)