Talk:Japanese battleship Kawachi/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 20:40, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status and should have my full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 20:40, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Design - Do we have an article for the 1907 Warship Supplement Program? If not, is it a viable redlink?
- No article and I think that an article is really only possible if you read Japanese.
- Construction, "the battleship Mikasa had a fire was started by a sailor" - fire that was, I think.
- Construction, "Kawachi at Yokosuka." - Kawachi was at, I think.
- Construction, Battle of Tsingtao should be linked on the first occurrence, not the second.
- Linked in the lede
- Construction, do we have links for the First Squadron and Second Squadron?
- No, and I'm not even sure that I can put together what ships were in them when.
- Construction, "would delay the construction of one battlecruiser by over a year." Why would the salvage of one ship delay the construction of another?
- Limited resources like money, drydock space and skilled labor are my guesses. The firmest of these is drydock space, I think, but even that's not noted in any of my sources.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- File:Kawachi.jpg needs a source. There appear to be a bunch of pictures on navweaps - perhaps one of them is the same as this?
- Added.
- File:Kawachi.jpg needs a source. There appear to be a bunch of pictures on navweaps - perhaps one of them is the same as this?
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- A few prose niggles and one image question. Otherwise a nice little article. Dana boomer (talk) 21:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Responded to everything, I think. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:50, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- OK, everything looks good. Passing to GA. Dana boomer (talk) 20:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- A few prose niggles and one image question. Otherwise a nice little article. Dana boomer (talk) 21:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: