Talk:Janowiec and Others v. Russia

A fact from Janowiec and Others v. Russia appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 November 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that four justices dissented in the verdict of the European Court of Human Rights case concerning the Katyn massacre, calling it a denial of justice and a failure of conscience?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Janowiec and Others v. Russia.

Wikipedia

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poland Mid‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 15:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the verdict of the European Court of Human Rights case Janowiec and Others v. Russia concerning the Katyn massacre has been criticized by a number of scholars? Source: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=202716 and others (the entire analysis section, I did not see any source that praised the court or dissented with the other scholars).
- ALT1:... that four justices dissented to the verdict of the European Court of Human Rights case Janowiec and Others v. Russia concerning the Katyn massacre saying it is a denial of justice and a failure of conscience? Source: https://books.google.com/books?id=4NQ4DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT68 , https://books.google.com/books?id=JFNKDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA111 , https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=202726 and https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325415595076

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Historical policy of Law and Justice

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self-nominated at 05:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. I think ALT1 is the best hook. Krakkos (talk) 14:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The QPQ has already been used at Template:Did you know nominations/L'An 2440, rêve s'il en fut jamais.
Also, is it necessary to spell out the case name, or can you pipe the link into the verdict? Yoninah (talk) 19:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoninah: Oh, I probably meant the Template:Did you know nominations/The Holocaust and social media as the QPQ here and added the wrong link. And you are right, the hooks can be shortened, but I think the piple should go for the case not the verdict. See below. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MAINa: ... that the verdict of the European Court of Human Rights case concerning the Katyn massacre has been criticized by a number of scholars? Source: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=202716 and others (the entire analysis section, I did not see any source that praised the court or dissented with the other scholars).
- ALT1a:... that four justices dissented to the verdict of the European Court of Human Rights case concerning the Katyn massacre saying it is a denial of justice and a failure of conscience? Source: https://books.google.com/books?id=4NQ4DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT68 , https://books.google.com/books?id=JFNKDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA111 , https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=202726 and https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325415595076

@Piotrus: QPQ done, thanks. When we do US Supreme Court cases, we pipe this way (I also tweaked the wording in ALT1b, which I'd like to promote):
ALT0b: ... that the verdict of the European Court of Human Rights case concerning the Katyn massacre has been criticized by a number of scholars? Source: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=202716 and others (the entire analysis section, I did not see any source that praised the court or dissented with the other scholars).
ALT1b:... that four justices dissented to the verdict of the European Court of Human Rights case concerning the Katyn massacre, calling it a denial of justice and a failure of conscience? Yoninah (talk) 10:34, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Looks good to me. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Restoring tick for ALT1b per Krakkos' review. Yoninah (talk) 15:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]