Talk:Janet Cornfoot

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: I have passed this article, but it needs essential information about the period in history when this took place and when she lived. I have added categories to the article.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:37, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Pittenweem witches with Janet Cornfoot

Full description is already in the parent page. Person known for one event. Best left as a redirect. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 06:36, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mild oppose I have expanded the article. I agree that this person was only known for one event but, in the context of the recent controversy over the rejection of a memorial, I am not sure that it would be a good look for wikipedia to delete an article which was specially dedicated to Cornfoot. Dormskirk (talk) 12:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: looking at the articles, I'm not sure "witch" one merges with "witch" ("which".. pun intended lol). Seriously though, it appears the primary article should be the event (Pittenween witches), with the merge of the alleged witch into the main event. This article (Janet Cornfoot) seems to fail WP:BIO1E and WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Cheers! It's me... Sallicio!^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 15:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Janet Cornfoot to Pittenweem witches, which is a comprehensive article. 2A00:23EE:1531:28B4:4DD0:83FB:C35D:2BDA (talk) 08:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: Merge was decided in AfD for similar situation. See: WP:Articles_for_deletion/Beatrix_Lang It's me... Sallicio!^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 19:08, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]