Talk:Jane Eyre (1910 film)
 | Jane Eyre (1910 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 7, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from Jane Eyre (1910 film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 April 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jane Eyre (1910 film). |  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Jane Eyre (1910 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 20:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Lead section
- "but it is possible that Lloyd Lonergan adapted the work." Change possible to presumed.
- :
Done See rewrite. "probably" 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC) - "but not without minor faults" Change faults to criticism.
- Done See rewrite. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
References
- Link the publishers of these sources.
Categories
- Add this film to the lost films category.
Images
- I assume there aren't any images/posters of this film?
Going to place on hold for now. good888 (talk) 12:52, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Shouldn't the plot summary be in a block quote? 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- I dislike block quotes because they are distracting and are not a requirement. I have not found any image stills or posters for the film, otherwise I would have included it. I also dislike how common the errors with stage productions being labeled "photoplays" shows up in books. I did some checking with two very prominent errors in the St. Elmo article, but none seem to be mislabeled for this one. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- I was just suggesting, not decreeing. I am also unable to put in block quotes, as they seem to have done something to the template. In any event, I was just asking, and its not a burning issue for me. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- No worries - you've reviewed my articles before and I know you mean well. I'm not objecting over ownership issues or anything, but I do understand the sentiment to use them. I just never seen them used in plot summaries and they really draw the eye away in sections where they do exist. Personally... I dislike block quotes for that reason. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:46, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks 7&6=thirteen for the edits you have made to this article! And thanks ChrisGualtieri for uploading a poster of this film and all the other edits you have made! With all issues addressed, I am promoting to GA class. good888 (talk) 09:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- No worries - you've reviewed my articles before and I know you mean well. I'm not objecting over ownership issues or anything, but I do understand the sentiment to use them. I just never seen them used in plot summaries and they really draw the eye away in sections where they do exist. Personally... I dislike block quotes for that reason. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:46, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- I was just suggesting, not decreeing. I am also unable to put in block quotes, as they seem to have done something to the template. In any event, I was just asking, and its not a burning issue for me. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- I dislike block quotes because they are distracting and are not a requirement. I have not found any image stills or posters for the film, otherwise I would have included it. I also dislike how common the errors with stage productions being labeled "photoplays" shows up in books. I did some checking with two very prominent errors in the St. Elmo article, but none seem to be mislabeled for this one. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Black listed site
[edit]Black listed site and the Italian first film. Comprehensive Guide to Jane Eyre Adaptations By Painted Seahorse October 24, 2012 http://FILLER paintedseahorse.hubpages.com/hub/FILLER Comprehensive-Guide-to-Jane-Eyre-Adaptations first American (and second worldwide) I rather think this is an important discussion in this single article, which I would like to have not blacklisted as I think it would benefit this article. I put in the words FILLER so that this would not be left on the cutting room floor. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 01:06, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't think hubpages is going to get listed when I am citing the Rare Book School at the University of Virginia for the same information. It may not be the best and most clear citation, but I think the source I am using is more than adequate to say something exists. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:45, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- That black-listed site says: "The first American film adaptation was released in 1910, and it was a silent picture. I say first American film adaptation, because Italy released a silent film adaptation in 1909 (“The Enthusiast’s Guide to Jane Eyre Adaptations”)" 7&6=thirteen (☎) 03:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Only question I have is why this source when the one being used states: "The first known film of "Jane Eyre" came out as a silent Italian movie in 1909."[1] Same information and it corrects an omission in a few other publications and indexes. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- It's cumulative. But there is static about the sources at DYK, and its existence is probative. A straw in the pile. 10:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- DYK is icky - I would have gone with Edwin Thanhouser crediting this film as the one that secured the success of the company. The 1909 Italian production is something even I have very little on. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- I was thinking fist American/English language movie version of the novel... You are right about DYK. But it is what it is, and we can't change the course. Only how we play it. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- It's cumulative. But there is static about the sources at DYK, and its existence is probative. A straw in the pile. 10:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Only question I have is why this source when the one being used states: "The first known film of "Jane Eyre" came out as a silent Italian movie in 1909."[1] Same information and it corrects an omission in a few other publications and indexes. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- That black-listed site says: "The first American film adaptation was released in 1910, and it was a silent picture. I say first American film adaptation, because Italy released a silent film adaptation in 1909 (“The Enthusiast’s Guide to Jane Eyre Adaptations”)" 7&6=thirteen (☎) 03:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Acknowledgment
[edit]"When the Studio Burned". February 24, 2013 source was copied from Thanhauser Studio. Inadvertently forgot to put this in my edit summary. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:31, 7 February 2015 (UTC) One of the citation links is broken.--Paleface Jack (talk) 01:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)