Talk:Jan Mayensfield/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 17:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will inspecting the Jan Mayensfield aerodrome today! Seems similar to the Dorothy Scott Airport (this one is public, though, etc.). TBr and ley 17:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the runways information referenced, as seen in the infobox?
- In ref 12, per the facilities section. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Link "North Atlantic Treaty Organization" upon first mention after lede per WP:REPEATLINK
- It seems to only be mentioned once in the article and then it is linked. Or have I overlooked something? Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - No, I don't think. TBr and ley 20:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"The airport's only regular service" remove "only" per WP:NPOV; it's not huge POV, just minor, but still
- Hm, don't really think I agree with you there, but I have changed it just in case. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"by 30 meters (4,900 by 98 ft) and aligned 06–24" would change ending to "being aligned 06-24" or something
- Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I notice that most sentences regarding the airport, say "the airport", of course, but I feel that on some of them, you could say "Jan Mayensifield" to start, like "Jan Mayensifield has changing weather conditions"
- Interesting comment :) I have added "Jan Mayensfield" twice. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"The airport has changing weather conditions" don't really understand, clarify
- Perhaps that is a slightly Norwegian term. Does "variable weather conditions" make sense? If not I'll try to find a better explanation. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great work overall. Once the minor above concerns are addressed, I will pass the article based on the good article criteria. Well done and I found no concerns while inspecting the airport, very good! TBr and ley 17:39, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the express service. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Per your changes, I will pass the article. Well done! TBr and ley 20:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.