Talk:Jan Lisa Huttner

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jan Lisa Huttner article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 27 February 2013 by reviewer Rushton2010 (talk · contribs).

Trim Article?

This is a relatively long article that goes into greater depth than appears to be necessary or proper in an encyclopedic context. Sections tend to take on the feel of advertising/publicity speech at times. I do not have a deep knowledge in this particular sub-field and do not want to minimize work on a topic as important as women in cinema, which in my opinion gets too little consideration in the world at large. Still, a review by someone with more knowledge in the field would be helpful to determine whether this article should be substantially trimmed or deleted. Magic1million (talk) 00:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC) EDIT: I made some changes to start with, but more may be needed (or perhaps nomination for deletion). As it stood, the article read too much like a resume, and hopefully it has a more encylopedic feel now.Magic1million (talk) 01:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability Established?

As I have now returned to this article a number of times, I am beginning to wonder if notability has been established. Many of the works cited tend to be apparently self-published, and the subject of the article's involvement with Jane Addams day appears to be overstated. At the same time, the under-representation of women in film and journalism is a genuine problem, and I would not want to nominate this article for deletion on my own without the input of someone with more expertise on these matters. Ultimately, though, it seems to me the article subject is doing good work but, even still, notability is not established.Magic1million (talk) 21:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Subject Appears Non-Notable

The subject of this article appears not to meet the notability standards for a Wikipedia article. Although she has appeared in some press coverage over time and appears to be an active member of an organization (the AAUW) that is notable, taking everything together as a whole, I do not see her as a person that meets the Wikipedia standards. Her primary achievements appear to be self-publishing books and getting some press coverage regarding her critique of Danny Boyle being listed as the only director for Slumdog Millionaire during the film awards season. Her work related to Jane Addams day appears to have been mostly in conjunction with the AAUW, and it does not seem that she was a primary driving force in such efforts. Even so, I wanted to open discussion on the talk page before nominating for deletion. Magic1million (talk) 16:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]