Talk:Jan Francis

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Sarmybook.jpg

Image:Sarmybook.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Year of birth

Is there any particualar reason why Francis is on the list of 1951 births if she was born in 1947? George.millman (talk) 23:23, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Her birth year was previously listed as 1951. IMDb recently changed it to 1947 on their site. Then someone changed it to 1947 on here, without altering the 1951 cats. I'd frankly like to see the 1947 date confirmed by another source. Crisso (talk) 06:28, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The personal responsible for changing the date of birth both on IMDb and on this siate was myself. I am a moderator of the Yahoo! Jan Francis Group and have collaborated on research for the Jan Francis Online Archive. 1947 is correct because, quite simply, we retain a certified copy of the birth certificate! 80.225.217.60 (talk) 20:45, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, that would be counted as original reasearch, since the birth certificate is not publically available for verification of your claim, I believe. Stephenb (Talk) 11:39, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copies of all birth, death and marriage certificates are publicly available from the General Register Office. The 1947 date is therefore accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.225.199.62 (talk) 22:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, here's her birth index entry which proves 1947. Crisso (talk) 11:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]