Talk:Jamulus
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Hi everyone - I'd like to propose we move the paragraphs explaining the issues relating to latency at the start of this article to Comparison_of_Remote_Music_Performance_Software. That information is probably more appropriate for that page as it applies to all the software listed there, and not just Jamulus. It's also a very good summary of the issues. We would of course reference that page in this article. --gilgongo (talk) 15:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
WP:COI disclosure: I am one of the maintainers of the Jamulus project and help with documentation and other non-code aspects. --gilgongo (talk) 18:33, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Go ahead! - Arent (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- The article is certainly overbalanced by the latency and jitter information that's not specific to Jamulus. I agree with the proposed change.—Anne Delong (talk) 02:46, 20 April 2023 (UTC)