Talk:Jamshid Behnam

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 June 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removal of prod

I would have to object to the idea that there were 2 false statements in the prod: there is no reference section nor footnotes that suggest that the content came from any particular location and their is still no claim that he actually did anything notable, simply claiming that he was significant to sociology and that he worked for UNESCO says nothing about his notability, these statements need to be backed up by at least one source each reinforcing this idea. As far as I can tell the external link is to a biography for a paper he writes for, which is not a reliable secondary source to prove notability, Sadads (talk) 16:59, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To say that an article is unreferenced when it has an external link is pretty much the definition of wikilawyering, and the statement that the subject is one of the most influential figures in the development of sociology in 20th century-Iran is a clear indication of notability. If you want more sources then plenty are available from basic searches such as this that should be done before any article is proposed for deletion. And for a recently appointed admin to edit-war a WP:PROD tag back into an article is disappointing, to say the least. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I take the hint and clearly I was not altogether correct in my assement, will move it to afd, thank you for clarifying your opinion, Sadads (talk) 19:48, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jamshid Behnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]