This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2018. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
@Mansheimer: You tagged the article for conflict of interest and notability. The {{COI}} tag attaches the message A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. to the article. I created the article and have 95% authorship (ie: I'm the only major contributor) but I assure you that I have no connection to the subject.
For notability, WP:NACTOR presumes notability for actors and comedians who have significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances or other productions. The subject's TV and film roles appear fairly minor (guest roles and some recurring) but she has starred in a number of plays which I believe are notable (though they don't have their own articles at this time).
It comes across as promotional and self-serving, and there has been a slew of these type of articles for very minor players lately, that do not appear to be organic. Reading this, it doesn't come across as an organic article, but as something perhaps written for pay or by someone connected to the subject. This does not at all read like a neutral encyclopedia article. As for notability, this person clearly does not meet the notability requirements, especially judging by the sources. Again, there has been a slew of these articles lately for absolutely minor and nonsignificant players. Mansheimer (talk) 07:44, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mansheimer: The article is written rather dryly and isn't much more than a list of works in prose form, but that does not make it promotional. If you suggest this was copied from imdb or linkedin, it wasn't, it was assembled from information found in sources.
I believe that the sources used do demonstrate notability, though I can understand some seeing it as a borderline case. However, the criteria is whether such sources exist and not whether the article uses them. (There's a fairly good summary at Wikipedia:The GNG and notability for actors.) The subject has a three-decade career during which she starred in some notable plays (WP:ENT) and won a national award with multiple additional nominations (WP:ANYBIO). I feel that it meets the requirements.
Is there anything else you'd like to add (eg: specific notability policies) before I ask for a third opinion? (Assuming that I have not convinced you to untag the article?) – Reidgreg (talk) 07:05, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If someone slaps a controversial tag on an article and declines to defend it with arguments grounded in policy, then the tag can be removed. In this case, the article was created by a fairly "veteran" editor, and the article hasn't had significant contributions except for Reidgreg's, so we can safely assume that the COI tag is inappropriate. As for notability, Mansheimer hasn't provided any actual arguments, when all that really matters is WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:36, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
