This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
Any US federal judge is technically notable (some obviously more than others), but Robertson decided the major case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, making him part of an historic Supreme Court decision. --Dhartung | Talk00:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And why exactly is any US federal judge technically notable? I hope you aren't suggesting that being an US federal judge makes anyone automatically notable (in wikipedia's sense, of curse). (Although I don't really know: maybe federal judges in the US appear regularly on TV or something).
Concerning this guy, if his notability is mainly due to the case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (which I don't know if it can be historic yet, but is certainly notable), it should be mentioned in the introductory paragraph of the article, so readers doesn't make themselves the question about his notability I did. If you agree, I'll add it to the article when I get time. --euyyn23:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
At Wikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judges, we've decided that all Article III federal judges are inherently notable. They are appointed by the President of the United States, require a majority vote of the United States Senate to take office (absent the use of recess appointments, which are notable for being recess appointments), and serve life terms, usually long outlasting their appointing President. They have the power to deem state laws unconstitutional, and routinely decide multi-million dollar cases from all areas of the law (their courts being of general jurisdiction). bd2412T19:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
