Talk:James New York – NoMad/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Bruxton (talk · contribs) 17:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Review
[edit]- I am happy to review this article.
- The article is comprehensive and has 4,900 words. I love that each fact presented in the lead summary, is repeated and cited in the body (I checked them)
- Need synonyms for "contain" - right now 27 occurrences. Also 28 occurrences of Design or designed. Might just see if any other synonyms can be used.
Done - I do not find evidence of plagiarism and my spot checks of citations do not reveal issues.
- The article complies with MOS:ORDER and it has an infobox with relevant information.
The images are terrific and since the US enjoys FOP for buildings they are licensed properly
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Yes |
|
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Yes |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
|
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Yes |
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Yes |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | Yes |
|
|
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Yes |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Yes |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Yes |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Yes |
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Yes |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Yes |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Yes |
|
7. Overall assessment. | |
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.