Talk:James Macnamara/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 21:12, 17 October 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Nicely done.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Publisher locations would be nice. Shouldn't The Battle of Cuddalore be italicized in the caption?

Added where known. In this instance no, as it isn't the title, unlike Cleveley's painting. I'm not sure what title Jugelet gave his work, though it is probably in French and calls it the 'Bataille de Gondelour' or maybe some variation, possibly with the date. The file title 'File:Bataille de Gondelour 20 juin 1783.jpg' may include the actual title, or it may just be a descriptive title for wiki purposes, I'm not sure. I've clarified it in the caption by calling it a depiction of the battle instead.

1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

2. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   What's a repeating frigate?

Linked this to the section in frigate which includes an explanation.

1. B. Focused:

2. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

3. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

4. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

5. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: