Talk:James Lighthill House

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 March 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in London may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Halls of residence at the University College London

Given that it seems to content is duplicated there, shouldn't this and Ramsay Hall be redirected to Halls of residence at the University College London?--Yaksar (let's chat) 03:46, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, Yes and Yes Mtking (talk) 11:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose redirect: The idea of a redirect was raised in this discussion, but the consensus was to keep as its own article. Onthegogo (talk) 16:20, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, that was a discussion that concluded this should not be deleted, it in no way is a consensus not to redirect this to an article that duplicates the exact same info while encompassing more. Do you have a different reason to oppose this?--Yaksar (let's chat) 16:24, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose redirect - Two editors who have both been persistently attempting to get this article deleted are now attempting to achieve their goal via other means. This article is of an independent notable subject and requires expansion, not redirection. The addition of some photos, for example, is a must. Rangoon11 (talk) 16:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And once again, deletion is not a redirect, especially when it's a redirect to an article with the exact same content.--Yaksar (let's chat) 16:40, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please, try to be rational, people. First off, AfD results, regardless of what they are, do not prohibit redirection. And even still, nothing at all would be getting deleted here. Yes, subjects need to be notable to have their own article. But all things that are notable do not have to be on their own page. This encyclopedia is about making things best and most efficient for the reader, and having the exact same content duplicated does not do the trick.--Yaksar (let's chat) 20:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose redirect - Per my previous comments.Rangoon11 (talk) 21:19, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]