Jump to content

Talk:James Kenyon (cinematographer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bury MP

[edit]

The page MPs elected in the United Kingdom general election, 1900 says the MP for Bury elected in 1900 was one James Kenyon. I assume, by the lack of mention of it on this page, that he was not the MP for Bury at any point, and so the link should be fixed. Can anyone confirm this? Tomkeene 21:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I very much doubt that a current MP would have been involved in film production at the same time! -- Arwel (talk) 21:05, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and I believe that Kenyon MP was a cotton mill-owner. Not, as you say, a film man. Tomkeene 21:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Kenyon (cinematographer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]