Talk:James I. Ausman

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 May 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Medicine: Society / Neurology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

I have followed recommendations of Wiki editors as to clean up this article of a notable scientist, neurosurgeon and editor: Citations in text have been verified, new ones added, irrelevant or corrupted ones deleted, and the reference format has been followed; particularly, inappropriate in-text external links have been corrected. The Article relies now on both secondary and primary sources, and most of the issues should be resolved. I can not find info on "Academic title" issue, as to what needs to be done. The article needs a picture. There is one in public domain. I don't know if I can place it in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.117.0.185 (talk) 19:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article is much improved and that a picture was needed. I have uploaded photo as requested. Thanks for your work and suggestions. Most of the critical editorial tabs at top of entry should be removed. LeBassRobespierre (talk) 15:49, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the image copyright, I have emailed the organization in which the image appeared and asked them to email wikipedia to grant permission for use or confirm that as per Wikipedia: "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, James I. Ausman. This applies worldwide. In case this is not legally possible: James I. Ausman grants any entity the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law." LeBassRobespierre (talk) 21:44, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"To the editors of Wikipedia: I have been requested by a Wikipedia editor to confirm that I own the copyright for the photo "James I Ausman, M.D., Ph.D.jpg" uploaded in this entry under my name (James I. Ausman) and I identify that this is a picture of me, that I own the copyright, and that I freely allow the use of this photo in Wikipedia. Any questions, e-mail me at jamesausman@mac.com" James I. Ausman, M.D., Ph.D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.150.106.1 (talk) 22:50, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To the Senior Editors of Wikipedia: This article has been extensively cleaned up and consideration should be given to have the "Multiple Issues" tags removed. LeBassRobespierre (talk) 18:57, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS Confirmed ~ Nahid ^Talk 04:33, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated tags were removed. When tags were placed there were was only a grand total of 6 primary references, all with external links! Much work has been added in the last 3 months addressing those issues. This talk page consensus reflects that general opinion as well!LeBassRobespierre (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on James I. Ausman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Medknow publisher is predatory

At the time he founded the journal, the publisher was considered predatory and is still not considered unambiguously reliable. I don't think C8 notability should be established from editing this journal. JoelleJay (talk) 17:28, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]