Talk:James Hurst

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Disambiguation

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

What is it with the last sentence?

The last sentence of the biography is vague, where the others are exact. It is also unsourced and not helpful. I think it should be cut off. (heh heh heh) Pittsburgh Poet (talk) 01:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/HistoryWorld/AustralianPacific/~~/dmlldz11c2EmY2k9OTc4MDE5NTU1MzMxNA== —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.42.189.205 (talk) 17:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Since my bold redirect of this article to the associated Scarlet Ibis article was undone, I'd like to discuss whether this article is at all necessary. What pertinent information does it provide to establish James Hurst's notability outside of his writing of the Scarlet Ibis? The article is poorly sourced and Hurst does not have significant independent coverage to confer notability - in situations where an author is known specifically for a single work it is common to have a redirect to the famous work as opposed to a stand alone article. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:07, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I didn't think it was the function of this article to demonstrate his notability - surely that is done by the fact that he wrote a book that we have an article on. Why not have an article on him? What harm does it do? It doesn't duplicate anything on the Scarlet Ibis page, and it does all appear to be true - I added another reference. If you do redirect, at least put the biographical info into the other article, but I would argue that it doesn't belong there, it belongs here. Chris (talk) 15:27, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All biography articles need to show that they meet notability criteria for inclusion; in this case the author is known solely for a single work - namely the Scarlet Ibis. There is no benefit in having a separate article on the author when his notability is completely anchored by his affiliation with a single work. I dropped a note at Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Author known for one work to obtain some additional input. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:22, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the conversation at the above linked discussion, I have merged the author content to The Scarlet Ibis. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:27, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]