Jump to content

Talk:James Freud

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attack Of the Mannequins

[edit]

should this really be added to the article? Is it really of importance? The band isn't all that well known, if at all! Wikipedia is supposed to be limited to notable information. Attack of the Mannequins barely categorizes itself as notable. I have seen the band name change twice in the last year on this page... lets get rid of it? Timbrushworth (talk) 01:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits regarding Harrison Freuds "girlfriend"

[edit]

Some reasons why I removed the info.

1. The first edit mentioned her name (Elissa Sursara) and the info came from a forum thread on the imdb page of gisele bundchen that has since been deleted. I've seen the thread before, at least 8 months ago, and it was a ton of bitchy girls picking apart gisele and elissa and their personal lives. It clearly disturbed administrators and was removed. Imdb message boards really aren't a credible source of information and im surprised the info wasn't removed earlier. Also, the imdb thread linked to a myspace that isn't even verified by the myspace celebrity section as being elissa sursara's... its hardly a confirmed page. Although there were comments on cheyenne tozzis page from it, myspace has never been accepted as a reference unless verified. For all we know its true and they're totally in love, but that source isn't credible especially considering her so called myspace has been deleted for about a year. Wait for something more concrete to surface, like a picture or a mention in an interview.

2) If the edit is true, then it should be added to a page about Harrison himself, not his fathers. He's not yet a celebrity in his own right and does not warrant his own wikipedia page, so adding his girlfriends name to his dads page is unnecessary - Wikipedia isn't a gossip rag. Besides, if it were true it would have been added to the elissa sursara page by now, which it has not.

3. Someone has since come along and removed her name, leaving just the 'brazilian-australian' girlfriend information. For starters, im pretty sure her nationality is considered brazilian (and russian) and removing her name makes the info even more vague. Someone clearly clocked that the source was dormant and removed the name but not the rest... wikipedia is supposed to be confirmed and blunt information. Since when did it become US weekly for musicians and actors? Rocktrulyjulie (talk) 06:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    • julie, this is also talked about on the lucket pickett topix comments so it might be true! No matter what I know one thing, this guys dad rocks. I wonder if they were big here in the states before my time. I know of elissa because of camilla belle, I saw their perez hilton thing on the old site before he got sued (hahahahahahahaha) and I must say, when it came out about camilla and joe I thought "I bet they say elissa is dating a jonas brother tooooo!" Newtowiki1996 (talk) 06:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • -- ELISSA looks like she could be megan fox sister or cousin or something. except smarter. and i doubt she is dating a retired musicians son whos band isnt even anywhere on google except for a myspace page result. weird.... wheres the imdb thread??? --Trip666Canada (talk) 06:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Like i said trip666canada its been deleted! and i do see the megan fox resemblence too. why does (i think the user florrie) keep moving all the discussion topics in the elissa sursara discussion page to either deletion or back here etc? wikipedia power struggles are so annoying. Rocktrulyjulie (talk) 06:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what are you talking about? The Models were a pretty major aussie band, there are way more than one search result! Unless you are talking about harrisons band in which yes, there are few results for them. Evervescenttwinkle (talk) 12:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    • is there any reason why this girl is the subject of discussion on the discussion page for James Freud? Marion Bridge was shit as is the plot for Sex Is Bad and anyone that looks like Megan Fox is a disaster. Back to James now. > Beekeeping33 (talk) 01:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

james on the countdown spectacular

[edit]

I saw a recap on television. Should it be added to his wikip? - Evervescenttwinkle (talk) 12:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC) �[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:James Freud/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

start: some info & infobox supplied; needs: in-line refs, more details, better sectns (e.g. Lead needs to summarise entire article), copyediting (e.g. some short sentence paragraphs can be merged or expanded), wikifying tone: parts sound like a gossip column (e.g. his son's dating of an actress: has no direct relevance to article);Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 09:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 09:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 19:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Freud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on James Freud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:James_Freud&oldid=1202149739"