Talk:James De Lancey (politician)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Present day money

Only $160,000? It seems kind of paltry. Weren't some people paid many thousands of pounds for their losses, equivalent to something like a million modern dollars? Jim.henderson 13:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

…Colonial Value, was for James DeLancey's Father about Eight Million which was Equivalent to acknowledge the Lower half of the westerly portion of Florida reaching the ocean, thus is a percentage of value.

In the evaluation determination's; A holding was a potential characteristic towards the Art's an Economical Structuring preference and the records to be in study of History, which is again a part of the Art's which affiliates with a Custom.David George DeLancey (talk) 02:12, 4 September 2008 (UTC)This is in relation to the Faction.David George DeLancey (talk) 02:12, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

==Complaint==We simply don'y know what realtions we had with, or thought about the so-called British

This article adduces to its subjcet views that may not have been his. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.253.90 (talk) 14:26, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]