Talk:James Cameron's Dark Angel/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Aoba47 (talk · contribs) 01:14, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Please add ALT images to the infobox image and the screenshot in the “Gameplay” section.I would adjust the first three sentences of the lead to be similar to the article for 24: The Game to the following: (Dark Angel is a beat ‘em up video game, based on the television series of the same name. The game was developed by Radical Entertainment and published by Sierra Entertainment. It was announced at on May 2002 at the E3 Expo, shortly after the television series was canceled). This is more of a stylistic change so it is up to you, but I feel that it makes the lead flow better and sound stronger.I do not think you need the adjective “draconian” “I Corporation”.I would move the sentence about Alba and Weatherly reprising their roles before the sentences about the reception.A lot of repetitions of “Max” in the “Gameplay” section so please vary this up a little bit more.I would move the sentence “Levels involve Max fighting enemies while following a fairly straightforward path to the level's exit.” to before the descriptions of her attacks against the enemies. It would clearly convey how levels are defined in this game and leads directly into the enemy stuff with a better transition.I do not think you need the phrase “during most levels” as it just invites more questions and confusion from the reader, and it is not present in the source cited.I would suggest that you do not start a new paragraph with “It also presents…” as the “it” is not immediately obvious.Link the show in the “Plot” section, as it is first appearance in the main article.The Wikilink to twin is not needed.- I would recommend expanding the “Development and release” section further if possible as it is rather short (I understand there are limited sources most likely about this game so I understand if this is not possible), but I would think that a GA would have a more developed, expanded section about this (I am not used to reviewing GAs for video games so I can be incorrect)
- Ideally a 'Development and release' section for a GA video game article would be significantly longer, if information was available. Unfortunately in this case it is not. That is all the information I could find. There just wasn't much hype about the game and then it got bad reviews so coverage was limited. Freikorp (talk) 12:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- I assumed as much, but I just wanted to check. Also, I figured it would be difficult to find a lot of information about this as the source material (the television series) had a relatively limited popularity. Aoba47 (talk) 13:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Ideally a 'Development and release' section for a GA video game article would be significantly longer, if information was available. Unfortunately in this case it is not. That is all the information I could find. There just wasn't much hype about the game and then it got bad reviews so coverage was limited. Freikorp (talk) 12:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
"Announced" is repeated in close proximity in the first two sentences so vary the word choice here.Identify who said the quote in the first paragraph (Fox Interactive producer Chris Miller) and that this is a part of the marketing for the game to make the source absolutely clear.The second to last sentence of the first paragraph needs to be edited to flow better, as it is choppy.I would recommend a different word for “cancellation” in the final sentence to vary the word choice as “cancelled” was already used in the first sentence”Integrate the second paragraph (the single sentence) into the first paragraph, as there is no reason to have a one-sentence paragraph.- I would recommend looking at this source (User:Mike Christie/Copyediting reception sections) to think about the organization/structure of the paragraphs in this section.
- I've made some changes, including removing several direct quotes as per the sources recommendation. Freikorp (talk) 13:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
@Freikorp: I apologize for the delay in my comments. Once everything is addressed, I will pass this. It was an interesting read. Aoba47 (talk) 00:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Aoba47: Thanks so much for your review. I've made an attempt to address everything. Please have a look and let me know if you think anything needs further work. Freikorp (talk) 13:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Freikorp: Great job with the article, I always enjoy reading about video games so I had fun looking over this one. ✓ Pass Aoba47 (talk) 13:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)