Talk:James Brown Scott

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

International relations: Law Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Erroneous and doubtful text

I removed this: "He edited and translated of Francisco de Vitoria the "De Indis recenter inventis" and "De iure belli" (1917)." because it clearly isn't true: Scott was merely the series editor, contributing a couple of pages of preface, as can be seen from this online edition: [1].

Some preceding text in similar style, about Scott's special interest in the great 16th century Spanish law school, may therefore be wrong as well: or it may be right. Perhaps someone else can clear that up. Andrew Dalby 16:04, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason Andrew Dalby didn't actually make this change, and it's gone unmade for nearly three years since he pointed out its necessity. So I just did. -- 76.15.239.115 (talk) 02:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]