Talk:James Barrier
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the James Barrier article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of James Barrier be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Improving
[edit]James Barrier was a wrestling promoter, not an actual wrestler (corrected in his article).AuthorAuthor (talk) 06:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Am attempting to improve this article to make it accurate, without opinions and conspiracy theories, and with citations, per Wikipedia guidelines.AuthorAuthor (talk) 08:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- I am attempting to keep this article unbiased. User SteveMiller4LV continues to repost uncited statements that are not based on evidence, from reliable sources and from what I have been able to gather, from police or the medical examiner's office. I have left notes to the user on his talk page. He's ignoring them and continuing to repost. Short of calling it out and out vandalism, I am reverting to the previous version. Thank you.AuthorAuthor (talk) 02:27, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Am attempting to keep this article neutral, but user SteveMiller4LV (and now anonymous) continues reposting statements that do not relate to the James Barrier death case.
- —Preceding unsigned comment added by AuthorAuthor (talk • contribs) 06:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- User SteveMiller4LV has received "talk" messages about reposting, over and over, an unverifiable claim. He has been asked to review NPOV guidelines. He either is ignoring these notes or he doesn't know how to access them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AuthorAuthor (talk • contribs) 03:44, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Explanation of GHB in James Barrier's body and coroner's statement with a citation should suffice.AuthorAuthor (talk) 03:48, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- The problem with SteveMiller4LV's addition is not so much WP:NOPOV as original research. I have explained this on his talk page. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:51, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification as well as the explanation on SteveMiller4LV's talk page. Hopefully he'll read it.AuthorAuthor (talk) 23:49, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- SteveMiller4LV just reposted the same thing again, only this time he's done away with the categories, references and notes (no doubt by accident because he doesn't seem familiar with posting). I'm undoing what he just did and putting categories, etc., back in place. AuthorAuthor (talk) 04:17, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Death
[edit]If SteveMiller4LV wishes to add the material that has been removed here is what he/she needs to do. Please read the following and the pages the links lead to if you don't understand what is meant. First find a reliable cite that verifies what it says. This means a publication that reports the death and identifies and quotes the opinions of the "experts" that you have not previously identified. The following do not qualify as cites;
- Forums, blogs and the the personal opinions or theories of fans, friends or family. See Wikipedia policy on this here.
- Cites to articles that discuss GHB in general terms and do not discuss James Barrier's case. Sourcing information from these articles and then applying it yourself to James Barrier is what is known as original synthesis and is not permitted on Wikipedia. You need to find a good source where someone has already reached the same conclusion, then cite it.
Once you have done this put it on this talk page, and if it says what you claim it says and others agrees, you can put it on the page. Wikipedia is not a place for you to campaign for the truth. Nor is it a place where anyone is hiding the truth. All that is asked of you is that the information you add, particularly if it is controversial as this, is verifiable so that readers know you are not just pushing a personal opinion that has no credibility.
Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:06, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on James Barrier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080610053845/http://www.reviewjournal.com:80/lvrj_home/2000/Jul-12-Wed-2000/news/13947995.html to http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2000/Jul-12-Wed-2000/news/13947995.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)