Talk:Jambi

Indonesia High‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

oppose, too many other meanings. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 19:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
support - Jambi Province is the primary meaning of the term. Other meanings can be found by the user on the disambiguation page. (Caniago 11:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]
~~oppose~~Support moving - ~~I am afraid I have to oppose the idea, because I am a fan of Tool myself and they have a song called Jambi. There is also a city called Jambi. However,~~ I do agree that Jambi (province) is the primary meaning, therefore it must not be on the disambiguation page. Imoeng 10:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The disambiguation page is fine to cover the alternate meanings of Jambi. A song can't be compared in significance to the province containing 2.4 million people :-) (Caniago 11:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

- of course it can be _compared_. Maybe you look up the article comparison.
Support — I think the name is primarily pointed to Jambi province. Though there is a song called Jambi or any other meanings, it can be linked via other disambiguation links from Jambi page, which is the province. — Indon (reply) — 10:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not a question what YOU THINK. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 04:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Tobias, please respect the need for collaboration and consensus. Also, do not write posts like the one above that can appear "uncivil". --Merbabu 05:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Why is this uncivil? Indon wrote: "I think the name is primarily pointed to Jambi province." But this is of no big importance in a Wikipedia what one persons thinks. There should be provided objective facts. Thus I wrote: It's not a question what YOU THINK. . (...But a question of how it is) Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Tobias, I think that is the difference between us. I think, but you don't. — Indon (reply) — 08:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Indeed I think the same. And I think that there are more differences then only one between us. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - No. Since you don't think, the above sentence is not correct. — Indon (reply) — 13:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        Since my last message had two sentences I am not sure which one you refer to. Nevertheless, seems you have different definitions of the words since, you and thinking than me and wikipedia have or it has to do with your way of syntax iterpretation. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 14:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        Since you are apparently "offering" english grammar lessons, perhaps you could inform us if there is any similarity between your seemingly new word iterpretation and interpretation? --Merbabu 11:34, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        
        Oh, wow!! Tobias, you should have this award. — Indon (reply) — 11:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
support - i second the reasons put forward by michael, imoeng and indon --Merbabu 05:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yath 13:39, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. *drew 14:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. Vegaswikian 20:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

unsigned misinformation from User_talk:Tobias Conradi Tobias Conradi (Talk) 04:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you're doing with Jambi (province). Be careful, what you are doing is in violation of WP:3RR. Let the discussion on the talk page pan out before you start feeling justified in repeatedly reverting the edits made to Jambi.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tobias_Conradi&diff=78044114&oldid=78037422

That was me who made that comment. You don't have to go off the handle because I forgot to sign my post. Simply use the {{unsigned}} template next time. WP:3RR does not say that it is okay to revert any article less than 3 times in a 24 hour period, and you were caught in an edit war over Jambi. I was perhaps hasty to say it was a violation of WP:3RR, but whatever it was, it was bad form. --King Bee 17:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, it was bad form to put a false WP:3RR violation allegation on my page without providing evidence and without signing it. Hopefully you will do it better the next time. Thanks for the template pointer, I will use it next time. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jambi is also the title of a song by the band Tool from their album '10,000 Days'.

Mynard James Keenan, the lead singer of Tool, wrote this song for his mother for whom he would give up all fame and fortune if she would be returned to him after her death. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.33.244.203 (talk) 14:54, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jambi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714121431/http://wwwstaff.eva.mpg.de/~gil/ismil/16/abstracts/McKinnonYantiColeHermon.pdf to http://wwwstaff.eva.mpg.de/~gil/ismil/16/abstracts/McKinnonYantiColeHermon.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]