Talk:Jakov Lukarević (historian)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Croatia Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albania Low‑importance

	Jakov Lukarević (historian) is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bosnia and Herzegovina Mid‑importance

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Jakov Lukarević (historian) is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

1547 birth?

Is the unsigned page published by the city actually relevant here? It could be just a typo... --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:14, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I did not know what to do- one source with a degree of certainty says "Jakov Lukarević rodio se 1547. g. kao sin kneza Petra Lukarevića i Mare Bonda.": the other source being www.enciklopedija.hr with 1551. So, I decided to include both, and say, well, depending on source, etc. :-) ౪ Santa ౪^99° 07:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think? ౪ Santa ౪^99° 07:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And , yes, I am too always for signed text, but as it seems both sources are unsigned - so I gave them both same wight. This city page seem pretty serious and devoted, and I wouldn't write them off lightly - they are some sort of legacy association, maybe academic in nature (museum, or somethong) ౪ Santa ౪^99° 07:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, unlike enciklopedija.hr, these guys are much more careful, and they sign all of their input. ౪ Santa ౪^99° 07:55, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the Croatian Biographical Lexicon articles note the authors and dates of each individual entry, while the Croatian Encyclopedia doesn't do that. This could be because the latter was conventionally published in volumes and was the core output of the Lexicographical Institute. Either way, the latter institution carries way more weight than anything run by a single city. We should find a secondary source, though. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:20, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I eventually included both years either/or for now. I have searched at the time but could not find anything conclusive, unless we accept [1]lazaretihub.com -biografija: jakov-lukarevic as OK source, in absence of anything better. ౪ Santa ౪^99° 19:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]