Talk:Jake's Famous Crawfish

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Start‑class Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

This article was a Collaboration of the Week/Month for WikiProject Oregon June 15–August 20, 2015.

References

Additional references:

Quick blurbs as part of Portland travel reviews:

Feel free to add more and/or assist with expanding the article! --Another Believer _(Talk) 21:21, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jake's Famous Crawfish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100409112820/http://www.wweek.com/story.php?story=5394 to http://wweek.com/story.php?story=5394

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whitney and Gray Building

I recently split Railway Exchange Building and Huber's Restaurant into Huber's and Railway Exchange Building (Portland, Oregon), and now I'm thinking Whitney and Gray Building should be created as well since this article focuses on the restaurant. @MB: Would you agree? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:08, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Orygun: I have a feeling you'd support a "split" as well? Meaning, creation of a building article separate from the restaurant entry. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:11, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree with keeping the restaurant and NRHP building separate. I think this is good restaurant article, but expanding it to include the NRHP building is a mistake. As I've said before, addressing two different subjects (a notable restaurant and a notable building) together in one article makes it difficult to add new content to the article. For example, incorporating material about NRHP structure (e.g. architectural style, building’s footprint, construction materials, interior of upper floors, etc) would be difficult … and has nothing to do with the restaurant. Likewise, to expand restaurant content, would require working around unrelated structural facts about a multi-story building. Also, what happens if restaurant closes and building remains with new tenant … or if another notable tenant moves into another part of the building? Bottomline, leaving these two distinct subjects in one article would make it very difficult to improve content for either subject area … so, I agree these two subjects should be kept separate.--Orygun (talk) 20:49, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Orygun, Thanks, I've gone ahead and created a stub for Whitney and Gray Building. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:08, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]