Jump to content

Talk:Jahanara Begum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Restructure Article

[edit]

There are too many sections with little information or even little differences. Anything that can be combined should be, and if a sub-section can be placed underneath an existing section, please do that instead of what has been done here, where every paragraph gets a new title. Justi521 (talk) 00:31, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]




To many different sections

[edit]

Someone really needs to spend time going through this article, fix up a few dates and erasing some of the categories that could be joined or are unnecessary. Would do this myself but don't have the time —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miss-jessie-gal (talkcontribs) 07:52, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jahanara Begum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi, I translated a part of this article in Arabic, but I couldn't figure out how to add it to the section "languages" for "Arabic". If someone can help me with this I'd be grateful. Thank you. this is a link to the Arabic version https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%AC%D9%8E%D9%87%D9%8E%D9%86%D9%8E%D8%B1%D8%A7_%D8%A8%D9%90%D8%BA%D9%88%D9%86

--Amanouz (talk) 11:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jahanara Begum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RS

[edit]

Alivardi many reliable sources aren't listed at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Sources.[1] I would agree with Ngrewal1 that The News International is generally a reliable source.VR talk 22:51, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vice regent: I'm aware that it's not an exhaustive list. It was the papers absence in addition to the grammar issues which I mentioned which made me apprehensive of viewing it as a valid source. However, as I have already told Ngrewal1, I'm not really interested in pursuing this matter further. Thanks anyways.
Alivardi (talk) 23:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ayman Mughees

[edit]

A love couple 119.152.4.238 (talk) 13:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]