Talk:Jaguar (supercomputer)

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Why does this article feature a picture of, as I understand it, an altogether different computer? JIP | Talk 21:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No one has gotten a look at the Jaguar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.182.194.195 (talk) 19:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory itself has plenty of pictures of the Jaguar available online. So it certainly has been seen. I realise that the Oak Ridge National Laboratory's own images might not be acceptable for Wikipedia because of licensing issues, but someone has already posted pictures of the Kraken on Wikipedia, so surely someone could go and do the same for the Jaguar as well? JIP | Talk 20:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cost?

How much did this thing cost to build, and how much of that was from the taxpayers? What are the continuing costs for maintenance? Ham Pastrami (talk) 04:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

resource; Nvidia with AMD

U.S. Plans Supercomputer Push by BY Shara Tibken in the WSJ October 12, 2011. 99.190.85.215 (talk) 06:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is called Titan, I had built a page for that and I linked it now. History2007 (talk) 09:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming name conflict

At this month's Hot Chips conference in Cupertino AMD will be talking about their Jaguar processor, which seems to be AMD's next low-power x86 microprocessor following Geode and Bobcat. Time to create yet another Jaguar architecture article? Jaguar (processor)? Jaguar (microarchitecture)? There's something ironic about the Jaguar in this article consisting of 224,256 AMD Opteron processors! --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 03:30, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Jaguar (supercomputer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Jaguar Petascale Supercomputer.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:45, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]