Talk:Jagdgeschwader 11/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article never should have been promoted to B-class. Many paragraphs needs cites, page numbers often do not support the fact that they are supposed to reference, badly needs a copy-edit, etc.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- see above
- B. MoS compliance:
- References need publishing locations, lede too short
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Page 80 of Caldwell and Muller only references initial formation and locations, but is cited nearly a dozen times.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- No discussion of poorly-trained pilots arriving in 1944 or of tactics used to offset Allied numbers, if any. No examples of numbers available vs. opposition's numbers
- B. Focused:
- Insufficient discussion of JG 11's operations in the context of the Air Defense of the Reich. No apparent use of Prien's definitive history of JG 1 and 11. No use of the relevant volumes of Prien's Der Jagdfliegerverbände der Luftwaffe.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
