Talk:Jactitation

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Clearer Wording

I personally find the legal section of this article incomprehensible. If someone could rewrite it more clearly it would be a big help to this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yipely (talk • contribs) 19:11, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

I agree -- it reads like an archaic legal textbook. I myself cannot understand from this article WHY someone might make such a malicious boasting, nor what the bad consequences are that might lead someone to bring this to court. The following phrases are particularly opaque:

* to prevent the common repudiation of their marriage

* the procedure is by suit of jactitation of marriage

* prays a declaration of nullity and a decree putting the respondent to perpetual silence thereafter

Mooncow (talk) 13:08, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-written the article, and I hope it should be better now. MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:26, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of this term in "Inherit The Wind"

There is a misuse of the term by the prosecution in the trial portrayed in Inherit the Wind (1960 film). David Spector (talk) 01:32, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]