Talk:Jacqueline Hill

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Mid-importance).

Doctor Who Low‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Picture

Has anyone got another picture at all? That one is hideous - or can it at least be lightened?--Tuzapicabit (talk) 13:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link to The Shrike; also, proposed link to external site

This is my very first time posting on Wikipedia, so I apologize for any cluelessness. Two questions: first, is it possible to fix the link to The Shrike? It goes to the film, but Jacqueline Hill wasn't in the film, only the West End production. I'm not sure how to make this right, though.

Also: I wondered about linking this external site: http://jacqueline-hill.com/ - but it's my own site, so I wanted to check with someone more experienced first. Also not sure it's appropriate for a link here, as it's not in any way official. It does, though, have a very tight focus on archive material relating to Jacqueline Hill's career (theatre programmes, articles, obituaries, public domain clips not available elsewhere as far as I know), and I'd like people to be able to find that stuff if they're sufficiently interested in her to come to Wikipedia.

Advice would be welcome, thanks. Swallowdale (talk) 15:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jacqueline Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131129225909/http://www.kasterborous.com/2013/11/introducing-an-unearthly-child-part-three/ to http://www.kasterborous.com/2013/11/introducing-an-unearthly-child-part-three

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]