Talk:Jacqueline Domac

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This redirect is supported by the politics and government work group.

Animal rights Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I don't think this woman's notability has sufficiently established... can anyone expand this article? --mdd4696 01:09, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

She's a great woman and and an amazing friend. That's all you need to know. That's what makes her notable. Her accomplishments and hard work are only a plus that come along with her package.

Well, that and being a predatory child-molester who abused Ed Furlong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.241.144.28 (talk) 12:03, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--65.117.246.209 20:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that this article be deleted for lack of notability. 75.135.76.119 (talk) 03:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]