Talk:Jacqueline Davies

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Untitled

It should also be said that she's considered by thousands of people to be out of touch in the recent Twitter legal test after a guy was fined £1000 for making a joke on Twitter (see BBC News, Robin Hood airport Wikipedia article and other sources).--78.155.49.242 (talk) 20:35, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, else it's an obvious POV by omission. Unless of course you can find *one* source that reports her decision without at least implying that it was perhaps a bit heavy-handed, not to mention the IAmSpartacus backlash etc. 220.210.180.179 (talk) 09:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Number of exclamation marks

This may seem like a small point, but I've seen the original tweet quoted elsewhere with two exclamation marks at the end, not one (including in the main WP article about the trial). I'm not sure which it is, but I think it's important to get it right-- it has a bearing on how obvious it is that the tweet was hyperbolic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SDavies (talk • contribs) 12:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited it to add the second exclamation mark that appears in most news stories, the reference only has one though, so I'm not sure if that needs changing. Multiple news reports from the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-19009344) and guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/nov/11/twitter-joke-trial-appeal-verdict) have the second exclamation mark if someone feels the need to change the reference, or there's stories specifically mentioning that there were multiple marks ( http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2012/06/twitter-joke-trial-david-allen-green or http://reverttosaved.com/2012/05/28/bbc-mis-quotes-paul-chambers-twitter-joke-trial-tweet-presumably-because-electrons-cost-lots-of-money/ ) Jasonisme (talk) 12:13, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]