Jump to content

Talk:Jacobus Capitein/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 15:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I will take this review. Initial impressions are favourable. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Dabberoni15, this is an excellent article. One or two minor points: 1) should the school Capitein established at Elmina be mentioned in the "Return to Africa" section; 2) there were several duplicate links which I have fixed; 3) the lead section is slightly repetitive and could be smoothened. Otherwise, well done. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    AirshipJungleman29, Thanks for reviewing another article of mine. In regards to your first point, I agree that the section as it stood would probably fit better in the "Return to Africa" section, but I feel that the bit about Capitein's school and orphanage was better placed in the legacy section, as it was the only tangible legacy that he left in Elmina. I have reworded the section to make this obvious. In regards to your second point, I am unsure as to what exactly is repetitive about the lede section. Perhaps if you gave me a list of things to fix then I could do that easily. Regards, Dabberoni15 (talk) 23:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmm. My initial feeling was that the second sentence of the lead was unnecessary. However, on reading it again, I think it's satisfactory for GA standard, although it would get noticed at FA. Congratulations, Dabberoni15, I'll promote it now. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:34, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.