Talk:Jacob L. Beilhart/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 10:14, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The lead is only two sentences long. Add important aspects from his early life, the foundation of the society and the last years. Two - three more sentences ought to do.--GoP _T ^C _N 11:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Blog accepted because the author is an expert
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: I copyedited the article a bit and linked some uncommon words. Otherwise the article deserves the icon if you expand the section a bit.--GoP _T ^C _N 11:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pass/Fail:

I've expanded the lead section. I'm always fearful that I'm including too much once I get started. I believe that I've addressed the concerns expressed above. Thanks! Wikipelli ^Talk 18:36, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Better, but the last sentence of the lead is not cited, though. Regards.--GoP _T ^C _N 20:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had left it off (per my comment on your talk page).... I've added the reference now. Thanks! Wikipelli ^Talk 20:08, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, then I will pass the article! :)--GoP _T ^C _N 20:12, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]